Answers to Manmohan, Sonia and Rahul

Well it took the top 3 of Congress to come down heavily on BJP's Loh purush Advani making the debate whether Advani is fit as a PM or not rather than focussing on Manmohan's achievements and image which I think doen't even exist for congress itself. This itself takes away credibility of the PM as one can not strenghen the weak by weaking the strong as being carried forward by the attack of Conress' tri murti. The trio have raisen three major points on why Advani shouldn't be a strong PM and I think it was completely baseless of them to do so and can be contradicted just by recalling those incidents 

1 - Kandahar incident - Well, it was an all party decision and the Congress had backed up the Government idea and hence is equally responsible for it

2 - Jinnah issue - I still don't see what wrong did Advani say there regarding Jinnah. He actually tried to embarass Pakistan saying it had contricted its creator's ideals itself

3 - Babri demolition -  Advani condemned it as soon as he came to know about the demolition of the structure which was never a mosque in the sense prayers were carried out there. 

Also, there might be differences of opinion within the party on some issues as BJP is a democratic party with different people from different families holding important offices on merit unlike the family tradition in Congress which have reduced the Prime Ministers office and Manmohan to a night watchman which made The Economist call the Indian PM as "A PM in office but not in power" and its a shame that a global magazine of such repute acknowledges something which even we refued to accept but happens to be reality bringing down India's image which already had been under hammer after Jai ho which the Congress is still enjoying singing too regardless of that fact that it wasn't an Indian film at Oscar but a British entry and also the image which it has made of the city and the country.